Author Archives: Ravali Reddy

Comment on Please No Tech at the Dinner Table by Ravali Reddy

This is behavior that I find infuriating but hypocritically engage in. What do you think the etiquette for technology use at dinner and other social engagements should be? Are there moments where one is allowed to pull out his/her phone? Should phones be left at home? One interesting solution that I’ve heard of is everyone putting his or her phone in the middle of the table for the duration of dinner, so that there’s no risk of someone pulling out their phone and trying to use it under the table while zoning out of the conversation. What are your thoughts on that?

Comment on Leveraging George Takei’s Social Capital on Facebook by Ravali Reddy

George Takei’s Facebook presence has confused and awed me for a while now. I would say he pops into my newsfeed at least a few times every week, when random Facebook friends of mine share something funny that he posted. It’s really impressive that he’s managed to cultivate this following simply by sharing funny content on a regular basis. It’s not necessarily that he’s original, he’s just consistent and posts often. That having been said, I think it’s important to acknowledge the fact that Takei’s devoted following stems primarily from his celebrity. If some random person were to post random funny tidbits as often as Takei did, I think he or she would be considered annoying rather than worthy of following. What do you think?

Comment on Celebrity Social Capital on Broadway by Ravali Reddy

Ken, first off, I have to say that I’m extremely glad you’ve decided to keep blogging. I’m looking forward to reading your thoughts regarding theater as you seem quite knowledgeable in the field!

That having been said, I found this post to be particularly interesting. To be honest, I’m not sure what the answer is here, and I think it’s something that art struggles with in many different forms, not just on Broadway. For example, I was really excited to hear that the book “The Giver” was going to be made into a film, because it was a book that I really enjoyed reading as a child. Shortly after that announcement was made, however, it was revealed that Taylor Swift had been cast in the film, and I was struck with disbelief. How could anyone possibly justify that casting decision? It was clearly the wrong call artistically, but financially, it guaranteed that the movie would be a huge hit. I don’t know even know when the film is scheduled to be released (because I don’t plan on seeing it anymore), but I don’t doubt that it will now draw in large audiences and young fans who have never read, or maybe even heard of, the original book.

This led me to further question the problems associated with casting big-name actors. Since doing so has the potential to turn away “true fans” (which I’m defining as those who consider themselves purists or who would be upset by this sort of decision), do you think it’s diluting the audience appreciation? To rephrase that, I’m curious as to what your thoughts are on whether treating Broadway and other art forms as businesses is switching one audience out for another. While some may see these casting decisions as bringing theater into the mainstream, others may argue that it’s simply creating a greater rift between the mainstream audience and true connoisseurs of the art. What do you think?